Mitt Romney did not have great answers to their questions as Barack Obama was more satisfying with his. The first question when the college student asks what they could say to assure that he would be able to find work, Mitt Romney, rather then saying what he planed, he talked more about how difficult getting a job is and explain that he 'knew' what to do. He brought up that he had to work three different jobs and that college students aren't getting college level jobs. He did not answered the question and gave no evidence. Obama gave a more satisfying speech. He gave examples of what he planned.
He mentions investing in manufacturers and that it could help small businesses, creating more work opportunities. The second question about oil prices, Obama brought up how the prices should be decreasing because of the use of clean energy sources. He mentions that America should build new energy sources and compete with the world to produce clean energy. Mitt Romney brings up that he wants America to be 'energy independent' in other words he wants America to make more energy sources and increase drilling and agree to the pipeline to Canada relying on even more energy. Both candidates gave very little examples on this topic but explained a lot. Obama stayed on topic and did not side track much at all, while Mitt Romney side tracked a lot and explained little about his plans.
Debates like this don't happen in countries we've been studying. A good handful of nations do get to debate like this but it is less likely to happen in nations in distress and war torn. In those countries the people would find quick answers and if they don't get it their way they'll get it by force if they have to. Usually for control of the land they can't debate who runs the land, they have to take it.
No comments:
Post a Comment